Configuring EzPlanet WRT54GS firmware for dual WAN (multi homed)
There are a number of routers supported by
EzPlanet running Linux that have a base WAN (Ethernet) port and one or more LAN Ethernet ports.
These routers could also be configured to load balance two (or more) WAN (ADSL) Internet links.
The instructions in this article are gathered form DD-WRT message board and, with some modifications, can be applied to set up any Linux box to load balance between two or more WAN links.
EzPlanet WRT firmware configuration
First of all you'll need to create a new vlan, called
vlan2Enter in the web interface, Settings / VLANs. Set the PORT4 to a new VLAN.
Than enter in the console through a telnet or ssh session, and do the following commands:
nvram set vlan0ports="1 2 3 5*"
nvram set vlan2ports="4 5"
nvram set vlan2hwname=et0
nvram commit
here, the scripts I used to startup the interface. You need to call then in rc_firewall
wan2.firewall
Code:
#!/bin/shWAN2_IFNAME=vlan2
WAN2_IPADDR=10.0.0.2
WAN2_GATEWAY=10.0.0.1
WAN2_NETMASK=255.0.0.0if [ "$(nvram get wan2_ipaddr)" != "$WAN2_IPADDR" ]; then
nvram set wan2_ifname=$WAN2_IFNAME
nvram set wan2_ipaddr=$WAN2_IPADDR
nvram set wan2_gateway=$WAN2_GATEWAY
nvram set wan2_netmask=$WAN2_NETMASK
nvram commit
fiifconfig $(nvram get wan2_ifname) up $(nvram get wan2_ipaddr) netmask $(nvram get wan2_netmask)
routes.firewall
Code:
#!/bin/ship rule fluship rule add lookup main prio 32766
ip rule add lookup default prio 32767ip rule add from $(nvram get wan_ipaddr) table 100 prio 100
ip rule add fwmark 0x100 table 100 prio 101ip rule add from $(nvram get wan2_ipaddr) table 200 prio 200
ip rule add fwmark 0x200 table 200 prio 201ip route flush table 100
ip route flush table 200for TABLE in 100 200
do
ip route | grep link | while read ROUTE
do
ip route add table $TABLE to $ROUTE
done
doneip route add table 100 default via $(nvram get wan_gateway)
ip route add table 200 default via $(nvram get wan2_gateway)
firewall.firewall
Code:
#!/bin/sh#DD-WRT firewall rules
#BEGIN
#apply simple forward rules
for RULE in $(nvram get forward_spec)
do
FROM=`echo $RULE | cut -d '>' -f 1`
TO=`echo $RULE | cut -d '>' -f 2`
STATE=`echo $FROM | cut -d ':' -f 2`
PROTO=`echo $FROM | cut -d ':' -f 3`
SPORT=`echo $FROM | cut -d ':' -f 4`
DEST=`echo $TO | cut -d ':' -f 1`
DPORT=`echo $TO | cut -d ':' -f 2`
if [ "$STATE" = "on" ]; then
if [ "$PROTO" = "both" ]; then
#udp
#iptables -A FORWARD -d $(nvram get wan2_ipaddr) -p udp --dport $SPORT -j ACCEPT
iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -p udp -d $(nvram get wan2_ipaddr) --dport $SPORT -j DNAT --to $DEST:$DPORT
#tcp
#iptables -A FORWARD -d $(nvram get wan2_ipaddr) -p tcp --dport $SPORT -j ACCEPT
iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -p tcp -d $(nvram get wan2_ipaddr) --dport $SPORT -j DNAT --to $DEST:$DPORT
else
#iptables -A FORWARD -d $(nvram get wan2_ipaddr) -p $PROTO --dport $SPORT -j ACCEPT
iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -p $PROTO -d $(nvram get wan2_ipaddr) --dport $SPORT -j DNAT --to $DEST:$DPORT
fi
fi
done#apply range forward rules
for RULE in $(nvram get forward_port)
do
FROM=`echo $RULE | cut -d '>' -f 1`
TO=`echo $RULE | cut -d '>' -f 2`
STATE=`echo $FROM | cut -d ':' -f 2`
PROTO=`echo $FROM | cut -d ':' -f 3`
SPORT=`echo $FROM | cut -d ':' -f 4`
EPORT=`echo $FROM | cut -d ':' -f 5` if [ "$STATE" = "on" ]; then
if [ "$PROTO" = "both" ]; then
#udp
#iptables -A FORWARD -d $(nvram get wan2_ipaddr) -p udp --dport $SPORT:$EPORT -j ACCEPT
iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -p udp -d $(nvram get wan2_ipaddr) --dport $SPORT:$EPORT -j DNAT --to $TO
#tcp
#iptables -A FORWARD -d $(nvram get wan2_ipaddr) -p tcp --dport $SPORT:$EPORT -j ACCEPT
iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -p tcp -d $(nvram get wan2_ipaddr) --dport $SPORT:$EPORT -j DNAT --to $TO
else
#iptables -A FORWARD -d $(nvram get wan2_ipaddr) -p $PROTO --dport $SPORT:$EPORT -j ACCEPT
iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -p $PROTO -d $(nvram get wan2_ipaddr) --dport $SPORT:$EPORT -j DNAT --to $TO
fi
fi
done
iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -p icmp -d $(nvram get wan2_ipaddr) -j DNAT --to $(nvram get lan_ipaddr)if [ $(nvram get remote_management) -eq 1 ]; then
iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -p tcp -d $(nvram get wan2_ipaddr)
--dport $(nvram get http_wanport) -j DNAT --to $(nvram get lan_ipaddr):$(nvram get http_lanport)
fiif [ $(nvram get dmz_enable) -eq 1 ]; then
DMZ_IP=$(nvram get lan_ipaddr | sed -r 's/[0-9]+$//')$(nvram get dmz_ipaddr)
iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -d $(nvram get wan2_ipaddr) -j DNAT --to $DMZ_IP
fiiptables -A PREROUTING -t nat --dest $(nvram get wan2_ipaddr) -j TRIGGER --trigger-type dnat
iptables -A FORWARD -i $(nvram get wan2_ifname) -o $(nvram get lan_ifname) -j TRIGGER --trigger-type iniptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i $(nvram get wan2_ifname) -j IMQ --todev 0
iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i $(nvram get wan2_ifname) -j SVQOS_IN
iptables -A POSTROUTING -t mangle -o $(nvram get wan2_ifname) -j SVQOS_OUT#DD-WRT END
#Save the gateway in the connection mark for new incoming connections
iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i $(nvram get wan_ifname) -m conntrack --ctstate NEW -j CONNMARK --set-mark 0x100
iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i $(nvram get wan2_ifname) -m conntrack --ctstate NEW -j CONNMARK --set-mark 0x200
- Save the gateway in the connection mark for new outgoing connections
iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o $(nvram get wan_ifname) -m conntrack --ctstate NEW -j CONNMARK --set-mark 0x100
iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o $(nvram get wan2_ifname) -m conntrack --ctstate NEW -j CONNMARK --set-mark 0x200
- Use the correct gateway for reply packets from the LAN
iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i $(nvram get lan_ifname) -m conntrack --ctstate ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j CONNMARK --restore-mark
- Use the correct gateway for reply packets from local connections
iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -m conntrack --ctstate ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j CONNMARK --restore-mark#mask known packets to its source address
iptables -A POSTROUTING -t nat -m mark --mark 0x100 -j SNAT --to-source $(nvram get wan_ipaddr)
iptables -A POSTROUTING -t nat -m mark --mark 0x200 -j SNAT --to-source $(nvram get wan2_ipaddr)#permit access to wan2
iptables -A POSTROUTING -t nat -j MASQUERADE -o $(nvram get wan2_ifname)#restore-mark is done in PREROUTING. If restored again, will loose the outgoing marks
iptables -t mangle -D SVQOS_OUT -j CONNMARK --restore-mark 2> /dev/null#iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i $(nvram get lan_ifname) -m multiport -p tcp --dport 22,25,80,110,119,143,443,993,3389 -j MARK --set-mark 0x100#use WAN1 for common navigation, WAN2 for P2P traffic and others
#iptables -t mangle -I PREROUTING -i $(nvram get lan_ifname) -s 192.168.1.100 -j MARK --set-mark 0x200#iptables -t mangle -I PREROUTING -i $(nvram get lan_ifname) -s 192.168.1.100 -j LOG --log-prefix 'P2P: 'RP_PATH=/proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf
for IFACE in `ls $RP_PATH`; do
echo 0 > $RP_PATH/$IFACE/rp_filter
done
Once everything works, you should use the ip route equalize to balance the load, or do a
-j MARK --set-mark 0xN00 via iptables to redirect your traffig to
WAN1 (0x100) or
WAN2 (0x200)The firewall scripts does not yet implement the full dd-wrt firewall, only the basic port / range forwarding.
This script works for both outgoing AND incoming connections (most scripts only handle outgoing), so you should be able to accept connections in both links simultaneously (WEB in one and FTP in another, for example).
Sample
ip route equalize command:
ip route add default scope global equalize nexthop via 12.34.52.1 dev eth1 nexthop via 10.43.93.1 dev eth2
This simple round-robin splitting of connection table entries, often doesn't "increase speed" as most people mean it. If you start up a single download it will still only be as fast as one of your connection. According to rules of round-robin this problematic situation is frequent:
- HTTP/FTP download -> WAN A
- DNS request -> WAN B
- HTTP/FTP download -> WAN A
So you end up with WAN A crushed with load and B idle. I used this 4-5 years ago at a business. ON AVERAGE it works well. However the first thing most n00bs do when you hand them a recipe like this is run a speed test and complain that it hasn't doubled their speeds. Also, when you lose the round-robin coin-toss so to speak it can be a drag. I suppose with BitTorrent it could help since it's frequently opening connections.
If one connection goes down, all connections in progress over that link are just stuck. There is no failover mode.
This method it may be argued, is not technically a "load balancing" method since there is no intelligent handling of traffic load, no rebalancing of connections if it becomes unbalanced, and no failover.